Is it time for a term to replace 'minorities?'
By Leslie Berestein Rojas
KPCC 89.3 (Southern California Public Radio) (May 22, 2012)
Sometime
in July 2010, non-Latino white babies in the United States ceased to be
the majority of new births, with children born to black, Latino, Asian
and other parents of color accounting for more than 50 percent of
children younger than one last year.
And it begs the question: Do we keep calling these kids, and the racial and ethnic groups they belong to, "minorities?"
It's
a conversation that's been brewing online since news of the historic
demographic shift broke last week. One reader sent this tweet to me and
another reporter who covered the story:
"As minority babies become majority, we can stop calling them 'minority babies.' Yes?"
Long
before the latest census news, there's been back-and-forth over whether
"minority" is still even relevant as groups considered minorities have
grows in size and influence. In a follow-up last week, Rinku Sen of the
social advocacy magazine ColorLines, who arrived in the U.S. as a child
from India, wrote about the term "people of color" as a better, more
empowering fit:
Nearly
30 years ago, I learned to think of myself as a person of color, and
that shift changed my view of myself and my relationship to the people
around me.
It is time for the entire nation, and our media in particular, to make the same move.
In a more obscure post on a Latino marketing website, Hugo Balta, who described himself as Peruvian American, wrote:
....when is the media, the government, the country going to stop using the word "minority" when speaking about Latinos?
There
are more than 50+ million Latinos in the United States. Many of them
(so large in numbers) are the majority in several cities/neighborhoods
in this country.
True,
but it's complicated. Latinos do comprise the majority population in
several U.S. cities, including large ones like Miami, Florida and El
Paso, Texas. And their children, combined with the children of other
racial and ethnic groups, are a part of what is now a broad,
multicultural majority that will one day constitute the working-age
population of the United States.
But
on their own, these different groups don't have majority status, let
alone majority representation. In both government and the workplace, for
example, all of these groups - black, Latino, Asian, and others -
remain minorities.
Last
week, Georgetown University linguistics professor Deborah Tannen spoke
to KPCC's Madeleine Brand about how and why "minorities" is still used:
It's
important to realize, first off, that words are never used according to
their dictionary definition. They are used according to how other
people use them. So I think the word "minority" has been used without
any specific reference to numbers. It's almost a euphemism for groups of
any identity - it could be ethnic, it could be something else, for
example women. People sometimes would refer to (women) as a minority
before they realized, wait a minute, women are a majority.
So
the word "minority" really did never function with reference to
specific numbers. So I think you might hear it being used even after the
dictionary would say it no longer applies.
About Multi-American
In
Southern California, generations of immigrants are creating a new
fusion of cultures, expanding and evolving the definition of "American."
Multi-American is your source for news, conversation and insight on
this emerging regional and national identity. The site's curator is
KPCC's Leslie Berestein Rojas, an award-winning journalist with several
years' experience reporting on immigration issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment